1. First, a question about the sense of EOF's:You have some data(x,t) with space-time structure: 144 space bins (in this case, just longitude), by 240 time bins (months).
You want to decompose it into a set of orthogonal terms that add together to give the total.
Since they are orthogonal, each term represents some variance: cross terms disappear when you average the square of the sum.
If you keep enough terms you will get back all the variance (and more importantly, you can reconstruct the data in all its detail).
In the case of EOF (also known as Principal Components (PC)) analysis, you express your data as:
How many values (numbers) are in your input data array? 144*240
How many values (numbers) are needed to build each term on the left? 144*240 No! 144 + 240, much smaller.
If 5 EOFs capture most of the data's variance, how much smaller (in the above sense) is the EOFxPC representation compared to the full data set? (144-5)*144*240 No, 5*(144+240) versus 144x240.
2. Read in your field1 (let's call it x again). Use the same data from HW3 data source here.
Perform and display an EOF analysis of your first field.
You want to decompose it into a set of orthogonal terms that add together to give the total.
Since they are orthogonal, each term represents some variance: cross terms disappear when you average the square of the sum.
If you keep enough terms you will get back all the variance (and more importantly, you can reconstruct the data in all its detail).
In the case of EOF (also known as Principal Components (PC)) analysis, you express your data as:
2. Read in your field1 (let's call it x again). Use the same data from HW3 data source here.
Perform and display an EOF analysis of your first field.